By Cindy Rank
On Thursday, February 25, 2010, the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and the West Virginia Sierra Club, represented by the public interest law and policy groups Public Justice and the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment, issued a 60 day notice of our intent to sue Consolidation Coal Company (CONSOL) for discharging illegally high levels of chlorides into Dunkard Creek of the Monongahela River.
WHAT HAPPENED
In September 2009 forty some forty miles of Dunkard Creek died. A month-long fish kill that wiped out almost all aquatic life in 43 miles of the creek. Killed were between 15,000 and 22,000 large game fish, plus large salamanders and 14 species of freshwater mussels, some already ecologically threatened.
Meandering back and forth over the Mason-Dixon line (the border between Monongalia County, West Virginia and Greene County, Pennsylvania), Dunkard has for decades been a valued and valuable resource for local communities and the states of Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Near drought conditions in the fall of 2009 left Dunkard with less water than normal for that time of the year – water that often masked the high chloride levels in some portions of the stream. The combination of low flow and high chloride levels created one of those perfect storms that proved deadly. The high concentrations of chlorides contributed to conditions conducive for a lethal ‘bloom’ of non-native golden-brown algae that devastated the thriving fish population, mussels and other aquatic life.
HOW THE ALGAE GOT THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE REMAINS A MYSTERY.
Normally found in brackish (salty) waters in places like Texas, this lethal form of algae is not common and in fact had not been known to be present in fresh water streams of the mid-Atlantic region. Theories about how it came to northern West Virginia range from it being transported here on drilling equipment previously used in the gas fields of Texas, to the possibility that the algae can be carried far distances by the air. Whatever the reason for its presence in this part of the country, stream sampling done by the Office of Water of the WV Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) has shown that golden-brown algae now lurk in several other streams in West Virginia as well.
HOW THE STREAM ITSELF BECAME BRACKISH ENOUGH TO FUEL THE LETHAL ALGAE BLOOM IS LESS OF A MYSTERY.
So, was it one of those notorious acts of god ? … An unfortunate accident ?
Well, not exactly—-
CONSOL deep mine operations in the area have been discharging illegally high levels of chlorides into Dunkard since at least 2002.
Other sources of chlorides – including suspected brine waste from gas drilling (dumped illegally into the stream or injected legally into the flooded underground mines) may have caused an additional spike in the already dangerous levels of chlorides being discharged from underground mines in the area.
But CONSOL has been violating water discharge permit (NPDES) limits for chloride at its Loveridge and Blackville #2 mines for nearly ten years and causing violations of in-stream water quality standards in Dunkard.
Though the impact of these violations on aquatic life was not as noticeable when normal stream flows were sufficient to dilute the concentration of solids and salts from the mines, it appears that during the low flow of September the mine discharges overwhelmed the stream and contributed big time to the brackish conditions that spurred the fatal algal bloom.
Was the event unexpected? … Unanticipated ????
Well, not exactly —
For one thing, seasonal low flows present certain sets of circumstances that can be problematic on their own – with or without additional pollution. Incidents of mine discharges overwhelming stream quality are not unheard of. Problems created by discharges from the deep mine pools of northern WV have long been recognized and even the particular circumstances in the Mon River itself and Dunkard specifically have been spoken and written about.
– Readers of the Highlands Voice might remember 1988 when low flow conditions in the Buckhannon River allowed normally good water quality to be overwhelmed by discharges from mines some ten miles upstream. Due to low natural flows in the river the continuous mine discharges contributed a major portion of the flow in the river downstream. The effect was felt by residents of the city of Buckhannon and surrounding areas, users of the water supplied by the Buckhannon water system that draws its water from the river. People experienced offensive taste and color in drinking and wash water and cream curdling in their coffee for no apparent reason.
– A 1996 Highlands Voice article by Richard diPretoro described the existence of metal laden mine pools that were forming as the mined out deep mines in northern West Virginia began to fill with water. As the pools rise the water threatens to push out into nearby wells and streams and to flood active mining operations in coal seams above or below the mined out and flooded areas. Both situations require pumping and treating the water to protect miners, nearby residents and streams. Federal and private sources continue to fund research to track the advance, impact, and possible future problems associated with these expanding mine pools.
– In October of 2008 low flow conditions in the Monongahela River between Morgantown WV downstream into Greene County Pennsylvania combined with high levels of total dissolved solids (“TDS” or salts, sulfates, etc) resulted in problems for commercial, industrial and private water users. Corroded and clogged equipment, appliances and foul smelling and tasting water prompted many to sit up and take notice. Focused first on brine discharges from new Marcellus gas well drilling in the area, concerns have expanded and a broad based group of agency, industry and university personnel as well as interested citizens concerned about the Mon River watershed began to examine more closely the levels of TDS present in the watershed and the potential problems associated with those solids. The Upper Monongahela River Association (UMRA – a determined group of recreationists, retired chemists, engineers and local folk dedicated “to promoting the general development of the Upper Monongahela River, primarily in West Virginia”) now sponsors monthly water quality forums that keep the conversations going. State legislators from the area have proposed legislation to establish much needed water quality standards for TDS. [WV Environmental Council lobbyists follow and have reported on this effort in other issues of the Highlands Voice.] And similar efforts are being pursued in PA.
– The Clean Water Act requires states to survey watersheds, evaluate the quality of those waters and determine how best to clean up the pollution that impairs the uses of those waters by establishing limits known as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Regulatory agencies are then required to consider those assessments when approving water discharge permits and set limits in the permits based on the Total Maximum Daily Load established for the receiving streams. Margaret Janes with the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment and Evan Hansen (Downstream Strategies & West Virginia Rivers Coalition) have been particularly helpful in following the implementation of TMDLs in West Virginia. In commenting on the TMDL for Dunkard Creek (April 3 & 9, 2009) their groups insisted that the TMDL should be revised based on the presence of and problems due to high concentrations of TDS in the watershed.
LOOKING AHEAD
Representatives of federal and state agencies, academia and industry as well as local citizen groups are grappling with the issues at Dunkard and the potential for similar events to occur in other watersheds where TDS levels are high and golden-brown algae have been found. WVDEP continues to sample streams throughout the state and groups such as UMRA continue to draw together a broad cross-section of interested parties to share information and discuss options for charting a course forward.
To its credit, EPA in its January 2010 Annual Report* on the status of the TMDL program in West Virginia recognized that “… WVDEP has identified ionic toxicity [i.e. lots of total dissolved solids, too much stuff like salts, chlorides, sulfates, etc. in the water] as a stressor in some waters … [and] …believes that it is important for WVDEP to more fully implement a methodology for identifying ionic toxicity as a stressor and to begin TMDL development for waters identified as impaired by this toxicity.”
[*West Virginia, like many other states, was slow to establish TMDLs for our waters. In 1995 WV Highlands Conservancy and the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (OVEC) sued EPA to take over the process and to force the state to pick up the ball. As a result West Virginia has established an active TMDL program and EPA continues to oversee the process and report back to us plaintiffs on an annual basis. This 2010 report is the most recent of the annual reports required as part of a 1997 Consent Decree in the litigation filed by WVHC and OVEC.]
Proposed legislation meant to establish an enforceable state water quality standard for Total Dissolved Solids may not be passed this session of the state legislature. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection will, however, be doing a required triennial review of water quality standards. It should surely address these issues – especially with the prompting and support of EPA.
NOW
In the short term, while the potential problems with TDS, golden algae, etc. are being studied and discussed and debated, one thing remains clear: Illegal discharges from the CONSOL operations constituted a major contribution to the problems in Dunkard Creek.
We’ve sent CONSOL a Notice of Intent to sue because permit conditions and water quality standards are being violated – and have been for years, and CONSOL has dragged its feet long enough. Extending compliance orders is not acceptable nor is lessening the water quality standard for chloride in Dunkard Creek merely to accommodate the current levels of pollutants in discharges from these operations. Treatment to meet legal discharge limits and in-stream water quality standards will no doubt mean more expense for the company, but treatment options are both possible and available.
CONSOL may deserve a pat on the back for making the extra investment to incorporate energy conserving measures in its new headquarters just south of Pittsburgh (not many miles to the north of Dunkard Creek), but there is no reason the company should be allowed to continue to do it on the cheap when it comes to protecting water resources near its mine operations.
Click here to read the actual Notice of Intent